It sounds interesting but mechanisms behind this video are hidden. I don't see anything that justifies the apparent violation of the fundamental conservation of energy's law. Please, show me your conquest in a scientific way with the few words you need to do that. If you are not able to show them or you give just two or three confused explanations about the 'nature' of your management of physics, forbidding me to replicate the phenomena behind your machine, I can't agree with you. This is science. Thanks, MicheleEvery once in awhile, I have to stop and address one of these unsubstantiated claims. "200 times more power from ground zero". That statement is meaningless in the engineering world. As an expert in power management, I have to say that your loads are undefined and meaningless. Your initial turn-on energy is also undefined. Often those who commit fraud will have no instrumentation and depend fully on un-known loads. and unknown energy sources. Yet they will boast that they have made leaps over all other scientific arenas with no instrumentation. for any that thinks this could even possibly work I am an electrician by trade now for over 15 year simply put we cant make a device with 100% efficiency let alone over that the motor at best is 90% the generator the same if not less generators are simple machine so are the motors just measured coils of wire to produce a magnetic field that magnetic field is also what limit how much power the motor uses and what the generator makes it cant not be altered that is against all physics in order for the generator to make more power it needs a greater magnetic field which creates more rotational drag causing load on the motor increasing it power requirement move this from where the idea load/rpm is for either device efficiency decreases drastically 'free' energy is not possible as many great people have said energy isn't created only transferred so our best bet to find the cleanest most efficient way of doing that not wasting time on this As stated the Law of Conservation of Energy applies exclusively to a closed or isolated system. The video shows a closed system. The inventor claims that the system self powers with energy to spare to operate externam devices. The inventor states that his system does not defy the Law of Conservation of Energy, therefore by default he admits that his system is not a closed or isolated system as it produces more energy than is apparently fed inbto the system.So what or where is the system obtainnng the extra energy from as the inventorr admits that his system is not closed or isolated. The system is a perfectly valid and scientifically develop0ed system but the inventor choses not to disclose the source of the energy which is in excess of that available from the system. Not wishing to disclose the source of the energy in excess of that which may be accoundted for is the prerogative of the inventor. If the system operated in contravention of the Law of Conservation of Energy and yet maintained its exclusivity and isolation,. then the inventor is truly deserving of the Nobel Prize for Physics for having developed a system to which the Law of Conservation of Energy does not apply, a Law that has held to be valid, irrefutable, irrevocable, immutable and of universal applicability considered so by science from the begining when the scientific method was applied to investigation of the phenomenon of Energy.
3000 Watt Generator Powers Itself, Grinder & Drill Press
Watch video now
0 comments
Write Down Your Responses